Comparing the performance of two processors is not an easy task, because any given one can be faster in some tasks and slower in others. But, trying to take several benchmarks and specifications into account, I have made a classification system from 0 to 5 points. It is a very general approximation: if you want actual performance data, have a look to the processor tables at Notebookcheck.
| Score | Examples | Description |
|---|---|---|
 |
QX9300 | Very powerful processors, recommended for audio and video conversion, render, compilation and other CPU-dependent tasks that you want performed in the shortest possible time, and for gaming laptops with very powerful graphics cards |
 |
Q9100 X9100 |
|
 |
T9900 P9700 |
Powerful processors, recommended for a good responsiveness, some games and other CPU-dependent tasks |
 |
P9600 T9400 |
|
 |
P8700 P8400 |
Average processors, recommended for most tasks |
 |
P7350 T6500 ZM-86 T4200 |
|
 |
RM-76 QL-64 |
Low-end dual-core processors, they provide better performance than single-core ones |
 |
SU9400 | |
 |
SU3500 |
Single-core processors, good for light work |
 |
Atom |
towards the optimal laptop - optimitza.cat - about - contact us - 
If not otherwise indicated, content in this page is under a
Creative Commons License and is owned by towards the optimal laptop