Comments on: Laptop processor benchmark comparison (Intel Core 2 X9100, X9000, T9600, T9500, P9500, T9400, T9300, P8600, P8400, T8300, T8100, P7350, Atom N270)

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 04 May 2010 04:54:14 +0000

Also failed to mention it, but I ran Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 on it with Oracle 10g XE with no issues. I just upgraded to Ubuntu Netbook Edition 10.4 and am also running the same Oracle 10g XE and didn’t notice any difference. If you’re familiar, Oracle 10g XE runs APEX in a web browser as well.

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 04 May 2010 04:49:36 +0000

Access is 2003 or 2007 versions. Expect the Atom N270 to deliver AMD Athlon XP or even Celeron P4 performance with MS Office. Lighter queries and Office suite tasks, you won’t notice it. And it’ll be like most Office applications, awaiting user input. Heavier tasks, it may bog down, but freeze ? It is what it is. SQL Server 2008 Express runs on it just fine and within the limitations of Windows XP Home Edition.

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 04 May 2010 04:43:53 +0000

The Atom N270 is actually quite capable. I’m running SQL Server 2008 Express, limitations being the Windows XP Home Edition installation. No it’s not a server, but it will do nicely as a test bed or developer box. The beauty of it, as a cloud computing device, it has plenty of power to connect and remote desktop to a SQL server. I figure a more robust OS and a full installation of SQL Server 2008, it should be able to run that with no more difficulty than it does Express. Obviously though the resources will be used and the cpu may spike more often and closer to 100% utilization. But it’ll multi-thread a single core, single cpu server configuration. But also understand it’s the limitation. So there are things it won’t do simply because it’s not a quad core dual cpu system or whatever.

By: Felip

Felip — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:05:59 +0000

The Intel processor is faster. I don’t know about the graphics card, the actual card model is much more important than the amount of memory.

By: Hehe

Hehe — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:01:20 +0000

Which 1 is better ? Intel c2d T6500 (2.1ghz)with 512mb Ati graphics or Amd dual core rm-74(2.2ghz) with 1gb Ati graphics

By: Laptops with AMD processors (Athlon X2, Turion X2, Turion X2 Ultra) | towards the optimal laptop

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:50:23 +0000

[...] Laptop CPU benchmarks [...]

By: [HS] Comparaison de performance entre 2 PC - Page 3 | hilpers

[HS] Comparaison de performance entre 2 PC - Page 3 | hilpers — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:13:32 +0000

[...] > > merci pour votre aide > > — > Alf92 > > Strictement pour le CPU: http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17…0-t8100-p7350/ en plus court: http://tiny.cc/Ec40Y — [...]

By: Hugh Jass

Hugh Jass — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:57:33 +0000

Chris, the content of your question tells me you have no idea what’s going on in the first place. Don’t worry about the Atom.

By: Felip

Felip — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:33:52 +0000

It depends. It is worth if you perfom often processor intensive tasks or play demandig games, but to improve general system responsiveness I think the diference is going to be hardly noticeable.

By: ChrisB

ChrisB — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:57:48 +0000

is the performance gain sufficient between the T9400 and the P9500 worth the extra £81 i have been quoted for the laptop i’m buying.