<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laptop processor benchmark comparison (Intel Core 2 X9100, X9000, T9600, T9500, P9500, T9400, T9300, P8600, P8400, T8300, T8100, P7350, Atom N270)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/</link>
	<description>laptops and tech news at Towards the optimal laptop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:24:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Felip</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>The Intel processor is faster. I don&#039;t know about the graphics card, the actual card model is much more important than the amount of memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Intel processor is faster. I don&#8217;t know about the graphics card, the actual card model is much more important than the amount of memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hehe</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Hehe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>Which 1 is better ? Intel c2d T6500 (2.1ghz)with 512mb Ati graphics or  Amd dual core rm-74(2.2ghz) with 1gb Ati graphics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which 1 is better ? Intel c2d T6500 (2.1ghz)with 512mb Ati graphics or  Amd dual core rm-74(2.2ghz) with 1gb Ati graphics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laptops with AMD processors (Athlon X2, Turion X2, Turion X2 Ultra) &#124; towards the optimal laptop</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Laptops with AMD processors (Athlon X2, Turion X2, Turion X2 Ultra) &#124; towards the optimal laptop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-752</guid>
		<description>[...] Laptop CPU benchmarks  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Laptop CPU benchmarks  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [HS] Comparaison de performance entre 2 PC - Page 3 &#124; hilpers</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>[HS] Comparaison de performance entre 2 PC - Page 3 &#124; hilpers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>[...] &gt; &gt; merci pour votre aide &gt; &gt; -- &gt; Alf92 &gt; &gt;  Strictement pour le CPU:  http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17...0-t8100-p7350/  en plus court: http://tiny.cc/Ec40Y  -- [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &gt; &gt; merci pour votre aide &gt; &gt; &#8212; &gt; Alf92 &gt; &gt;  Strictement pour le CPU:  <a href="http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17...0-t8100-p7350/" rel="nofollow">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17&#8230;0-t8100-p7350/</a>  en plus court: <a href="http://tiny.cc/Ec40Y" rel="nofollow">http://tiny.cc/Ec40Y</a>  &#8212; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Jass</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Jass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-672</guid>
		<description>Chris, the content of your question tells me you have no idea what&#039;s going on in the first place. Don&#039;t worry about the Atom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, the content of your question tells me you have no idea what&#8217;s going on in the first place. Don&#8217;t worry about the Atom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felip</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>It depends. It is worth if you perfom often processor intensive tasks or play demandig games, but to improve general system responsiveness I think the diference is going to be hardly noticeable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends. It is worth if you perfom often processor intensive tasks or play demandig games, but to improve general system responsiveness I think the diference is going to be hardly noticeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisB</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>is the performance gain sufficient between the T9400 and the P9500 worth the extra £81 i have been quoted for the laptop i&#039;m buying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the performance gain sufficient between the T9400 and the P9500 worth the extra £81 i have been quoted for the laptop i&#8217;m buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C2D or DC ! - Page 3 - Laptops - TechEnclave</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>C2D or DC ! - Page 3 - Laptops - TechEnclave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>[...] as techie 07 asked.. But as far as the processor series goes kindly visit these links below  Laptop processor benchmark comparison (Intel Core 2 X9100, X9000, T9600, T9500, P9500, T9400, T9300,...  Notebookcheck: Mobile Processors - Benchmarklist  If u see the intel processors The higher end [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as techie 07 asked.. But as far as the processor series goes kindly visit these links below  Laptop processor benchmark comparison (Intel Core 2 X9100, X9000, T9600, T9500, P9500, T9400, T9300,&#8230;  Notebookcheck: Mobile Processors &#8211; Benchmarklist  If u see the intel processors The higher end [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felip</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to freeze, but operating with large spreadsheets and databases can be quite slow. I don&#039;t own any Atom-powered device, but you can find useful this recent review of Atom&#039;s performance at Tom&#039;s Hardware:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/shuttle-x27-atom,2038.html

It&#039;s the desktop version, but I think it&#039;s very similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to freeze, but operating with large spreadsheets and databases can be quite slow. I don&#8217;t own any Atom-powered device, but you can find useful this recent review of Atom&#8217;s performance at Tom&#8217;s Hardware:<br />
<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/shuttle-x27-atom,2038.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/shuttle-x27-atom,2038.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the desktop version, but I think it&#8217;s very similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Will Access 2005 freeze with the Atom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Access 2005 freeze with the Atom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
