Archive for January, 2009

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 gaming benchmarks (Call of Duty 4, Crysis, World of Warcraft, F.E.A.R. 2, Sacred 2, Red Alert 3, Unreal Tournament 3, World in Conflict, GRID, Far Cry, Half Life 2)

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

GPU-Z ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 is a quite common graphics card, often found in cheap laptops and its gaming performance higher than integrated graphics cards. While it is not a gaming graphics card, it delivers an acceptable performance in not very demanding games and, when resolution and detail level are kept low, even in the lastest titles. We are going to examine its performance in the demos of the games Call of Duty 4, Crysis, F.E.A.R. 2, Sacred 2, Red Alert 3, Unreal Tournament 3, World in Conflict, Race Driver: GRID, Far Cry y Half Life 2.  If not otherwise noted, all fps measurements were taken using FRAPS.

All tests have been performed in the demo versions, not in the full games. What impact can you expect on the measured performance? Usually the full game is better optimized, specially after one of more patches have been released, so performance can be better in the full game; but it is also usual that the full game has scenes of a higher visual complexity than the demo, resulting in a lower performance in such scenes.

All tests have been performed on a Dell Studio 15 sporting an Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 (2.0 GHz), 3 GB de RAM DDR2-800 and Windows Vista Home Premium SP1. Stock drivers were used. So both a faster processor and newer drivers can deliver better results. Results are expressed in fps (frames per second).

Call of Duty 4 (COD4)

  • Best performance: 800×600, everything Low or Off: 33-84 fps (average 50.4).
  • Native resolution: 1280×800, everything Low or Off: 8-48 fps (average 27.1)
  • Good compromise 1: 1024×768, Normal textures, all other settings Low or Off: 12-61 fps (average 31.1 fps)
  • Good compromise 2 (picture): 800×600, Low textures, all other settings Low or Off excepting Shadows On, Dynamic lights Low: 15-62 fps (average 30.0 fps)

At 800×600 and all settings at the minimum it is completely smooth, but visually the game is ugly and, removing shadows and most effects, it feels quite unrealistic. With shadows on and dynamic lights the game is more realistic and it is still quite playable. In conclusion, it is very playable if resolution and detail settings are kept low.

Call of Duty 4

Crysis

  • Best performance: 800×600, everything Low: 13-40 fps (average 25.3).

The demo is playable at 800×600 and even at 1024×768, but gameplay is not very smooth and can be annoying. In addition, some effects, such as fog and smoke, cause a noticeable reduction in fps, and this can be a problem in the full game: caution. The game is visually nice, but Crysis at minimum settings is not Crysis…

Crysis

World of Warcraft

  •  1280×800, Fair settings but High resolution textures: 22-30 fps (average 25.1).
  • Also playable at 800×600, Good settings (fps not measured).

I took the 10-days free trial. It’s very playable at 1280×800 and Fair settings, and you can even use High resolucion textures. Beware of expansions (mainly Wrath of the Lich King), because they need more graphics power.

World of Warcraft

F.E.A.R. 2 : Project Origin

  • 800×600, everything at minimum, shadows On: 10-61 fps (average 30.7).

I was surprised that one of the lastest games, F.E.A.R. 2, is playable in my modest laptop. Visual quality is quite good, but performance is lower when there are spectres and phantoms nearby, scoring 10-32 fps (average 29.7), so caution with the full game. Removing shadows will result in better performance, but in a game like this one I think it is very nice to keep them on.

F.E.A.R. 2

I uploaded a short video (30 s) to Youtube.

Sacred 2: Fallen Angel

  • Best performance: 1024×768, Low: 15-53 fps (average 33.5).
  • Native resolution: 1280×800, Low (picture): 13-38 fps (average 30.0).

It is good to find a game that works nicely at the native resolution of the monitor. fps scores are not very impressive, but this kind of game does not need as many fps as first person shooters. Perfectly playable.

Sacred 2

Red Alert 3

  • Native resolution: 1280×800, Low: around 30 fps.

Perfectly playable at 1280×800 and Low settings, but going to Medium quality results in slow moving units and laggy scroll, and that is a pity, because Medium graphics look really nice.

Red Alert 3

Race Driver: GRID

  • Best performance: 800×600, Low (picture): 30-40 fps (average 45.0).
  • Native resolution: 1280×800, Low: 13-31 fps (average 24.5).
  • Better quality: 800×600, Medium, MSAA Off: 14-22 fps (average 18.8).

Perfectly playable at 1280×800 and Low details, but it becomes too laggy for me at Medium details, even at 800×600.

Race Driver: GRID

World in Conflict

Tests performed using the built-in demo benchmark tool, not with FRAPS:

  • Good performance: 1024×768, Low: 12-114 fps (average 40 fps).
  • Native resolution: 1280×800, Very Low: 10-110 fps (average 42.0 fps).
  • Good compromise (picture): 1280×800, Low: 10-96 fps (average 34.0 fps).

The demo benchmark tool gives low fps when the big bomb is released, but playing the demo gameplay is smooth and visual quality is good. It is possible that, if big explosions are usual in the full game, playability can suffer, so caution.

World in Conflict

Unreal Tournament 3

  • Best performance: 800×600, everything quality 1 (picture): 31-57 fps (average 42).
  • Better resolution: 1024×768, everything quality 1 : 22-34 fps (average 27).
  • Better quality: 800×600, everything quality 2: 24-49 fps (average 35.7).

All tests performed in the map ShangriLa, that seems to be more demanding. In a multiplayer deathmatch you really want 30 fps at least, but you can get them. While graphic detail is low, gameplay is very smooth and visual quality is not bad (compare the textures below with the ones in the COD4 picture).

Unreal Tournament 3

Far Cry

  • Best performance: 800×600, everything Low: 110-200 fps (average 148).
  • High quality: 1280×800, everything High (texture filter quality Medium): 19-31 fps (average 26.7).
  • Good compromise: 1280×800, everything Medium (picture): 27-50 fps (average 40.0).

Far Cry is from 2004, but at that time it was one of the more demanding games in the market: at 1280×800 and medium details I still wish it was a bit more smooth. Anyway, it is very playable and visual quality is good.

Far Cry

Half Life 2

While contemporary of Far Cry, it is perfectly playable at 1280×800 and maximum quality: it is so smooth I did not bother recording the fps. Counter Strike: Source uses the same graphics engine (Source) and is from 2004 too, so it is likely that you can play this game at high details too.

Half Life 2

Other current games

Sadly many new popular games do not have an available demo, but you can guess if they are going to be playable:

  • Far Cry 2: playable on similar cards such as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3200 at 1024×600 and Low details, so it has to be playable on the 3450.
  • Fallout 3: playable on an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470 with a mix of medium and low details, so it is probably playable at low details on the 3450.
  • Left 4 Dead: seems to run very well on a desktop 3450, that is marginally more powerfull than the Mobility version, so it is likely playable at an acceptable quality.
  • GTA IV: it is a poorly optimized game that needs a powerful computer. Probably NOT playable.

Conclusions

Is the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 a gaming graphics card? NO! But lets you play many current games at low detail and resolution. As that the tests have been performed in the demo version and not the full game, I would be cautious before buying a game when the demo was barely playable. If you enjoy playing current games at good quality, it is better for you to look for a “600 series” graphics card at least: Mobility Radeon HD 2600 or 3650, or Nvidia 8600 or 9600. You can be interested on the laptop graphics card comparison or on other articles in the benchmarks section.

If you play games on this card, leave a comment and tell us your experiences!

Laptop reviews: Acer Travelmate 6293, Dell Inspiron Mini 12, HP Mini 2140, HP Compaq CQ70 and others

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

Here you have the laptop reviews of the week:

Other interesting reviews:

Laptop hard disk comparison (Portables4Gamers, French).

Do you want to be always up-to-date in laptop reviews? Subscribe to the news section of Towards the optimal laptop.

Dell Studio XPS 16 (1640) review roundup

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

Here you have the reviews of the Dell Studio XPS 16 I have found to date:

Did you find more reviews? Tell me!

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 gaming benchmarks vs Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT

Monday, January 19th, 2009

The new Dell Studio XPS 16 (1640) sports an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and maybe you are disappointed, because you expected a Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT. So what is the actual gaming performance of the Mobility Radeon HD 3670? The first reviews have popped out, so we can compare a few scores:

Game and configuration HD 3670 (fps) 9600M GT (fps) Source
Crysis: Medium details, 1024×768, AA off, AF off 16.2 17.8* PC Magazine
Crysis: High details, 1920×1080, AA off, AF 4x 1.6 1.8* PC Magazine
World in Conflict: Medium details, 1024×768, AA off, AF off 18 20* PC Magazine
World in Conflict: High details, 1920×1080, AA off, AF 4x 6 7* PC Magazine
Unreal Tournament 3: unspecified details, 1280×800, AA off, AF off 57.3 64.3** CNET
F.E.A.R.: Autodetect, 1024×768 77 77* Laptop Magazine
F.E.A.R.: Maximum detail, 1920×1080 24 N.D. Laptop Magazine

* 512 MB DDR2 version, with an Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 (2.8 GHz, 6 MB cache)
** 512 MB GDDR3 version, with an Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 (2.8 GHz, 6 MB cache)

All benchmarks for the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 (512 MB GDDR3) were performed using an Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 (2.4 GHz, 3 MB cache). So it is hard to tell if the 10% advantage in favor of the Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT DDR2 is because of the graphics card itself or because of the faster processor. Anyway, both the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and the GeForce 9600M GT DDR2 are clearly very similar in performance.

Please tell me about any more gaming benchmarks you can find!

Laptop reviews: Dell Studio XPS 16, Dell Latitude E5500, MSI Wind U120, Toshiba Tecra S10 and others

Sunday, January 18th, 2009

Here you have the laptop reviews of the week:

Other interesting reviews:

Do you want to be always up-to-date in laptop reviews? Subscribe to the news section of Towards the optimal laptop.

The GeForce 9500M found in the Dell Studio XPS 13 (1340) is in fact a 9400M G + 9200M GS Hybrid SLI

Saturday, January 17th, 2009

So the guys at the Notebook Review forums found it: the Nvidia GeForce 9500M found in the Dell Studio XPS 13 is not a single graphics card, but two: an integrated GeForce 9400M G plus a GeForce 9200M GS with 256 MB of dedicated memory, working in a Hybrid SLI configuration. The expected performance is higher than that of the 9400M G alone and lower than a 9500M GS, so the naming seems right, but maybe the actual performance is not as high as you expected when you saw the 9500M model number.

In addition, as Hybrid SLI is only supported under Windows Vista, so users of other operating systems will only be able to use one of the cards (probably the 9400M G).

Nvidia GeForce 9500M

Source: Notebook Review forums and Dell Studio XPS 13 setup guide (go to page 52).

HP coupon code (1/16/2009)

Friday, January 16th, 2009

NEW Coupon:

(Expires after 900 uses or 1/21)

·         30% off web-only coupon for the purchase of select HP Pavilion Notebook PCs configured at $899 or greater at the HP Home & Home Office Store.  Offer excludes Special Edition HP dv4t Notebook PC and all HP Mini Notebooks.  Coupon code: NB8543. Offer limited to the first 900 coupons redeemed.  1 redemption per person or address.  Not valid with other promotions. Restrictions apply. Not combinable with instant rebates. For complete conditions, see “Coupon Information” in the “Customer Service” section at www.hpshopping.com.

Dell Studio 15 (1537) review

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

Score: 8
In a few words: a basic laptop with dedicated graphics and a good configuration for the price. It is a pity that the speakers are so bad.
Purchase options: Dell Spain, Dell US, Dell UK, BestBuy.com

Most of the time I use my desktop computer, but during the holidays I need a laptop to keep in touch with optimitza (news, forum, e-mail…) and play some old games. The laptop has to be carried only at the beginning and the end of the holidays, so weight is not very important, but price is, because it is not going to be used a lot and it is not justified to spend a lot on it.

The Dell Studio 15 is a good option: it is a laptop with current hardware, with low-end dedicated graphics card and a good configuration for the price:

  • Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 (2,0 GHz).
  • Memory: 3 GB DDR2 800 MHz.
  • Graphics card: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 (256 MB dedicated).
  • Hard disk: 250 GB at 5400 rpm.
  • Screen: 15,4” a 1280×800, glossy, LED backlight.
  • Optical drive: DVD burner.
  • Wireless: 802.11b/g.
  • Operating system: Windows Vista Home Premium SP1.
  • Extras: card reader, webcam (2,0 Mpx) with integrated mic.
  • Price: 579 €; similar configurations cost 499 GBP (UK) (749 USD in the US, but with the Intel GMA X3100).

I decided to upgrade the WiFi card to a 802.11n because I know for a fact that the wireless signal I get at my mother’s home is weak, and I got the Midnight blue colour, so the final price was 658 € (with free shipping).

The laptop came without accessories: only the computer, the power brick, a Windows Vista restore disc, 3 driver & software disks, a Microsoft Works disk and the manual.

Dell Studio 15 - general view

Design and finish: design: very good; sturdiness: acceptable; finish: good.

The Dell Studio 15 is a consumer laptop, so it is not as sturdy as business laptops (Lenovo Thinkpad, Dell Latitude, HP Elitebook…), but the plastics seem of good quality. The screen has some flex and when the lid is pressed the picture gets distorted at some spots. Anyway, the laptop feels solid and with a nice finish; it does not bend when pressed with the hands and creaking is minimal. The screen is the only point that bends considerably. The design is very nice, but most of the surface is glossy and a fingerprint magnet. The Midnight blue finish of the lid is matte and good-looking. The power cord falls short, for me.

Dell Studio 15 - vista general

Dell Studio 15 - midnight blue

Screen: quality: good, viewing angles: good, outdoor use: mediocre.

The monitor is 15.4″ at 1280×800 with LED backlight. The first impression is excellent, since it is very bright and with vivid colors, better than most laptops at this price point. But when compared to my HP L2245w, contrast and vieving angles are not so good. Viewing angles are better than in other laptops I have used. As I do not make a professional use of color, I cannot tell about the colour gamut, but I have raised a bit the red level in the Catalyst Control Panel since the skin colour in pictures seems too dull. The glossy surface of the screen is not annoying to work if there is no light behind you, but if there is a window or similar, the reflection can be distracting. In the dark scenes of films and games the reflection is more noticeable, even without light from behind. Outdoors, even with the brightness to the maximum and working with clear background, the reflection of myself in a sunny winter day is too visible. It is possible to work, but it is annoying.

It is very difficult that pictures of the screen reflect what the eyes see, but here you have some images: the first is quite blurry, but it was made with low light and can help to get an idea of how the colours and brightness are; the second is less faithful to the reality, but you can see that the contrast and color are not as good as in my usual monitor, an HP L2245w.

Dell Studio 15 - WLED screen

Dell Studio 15 - WLED screen, compared

Keyboard: feedback: good, layout: very good, flex: very good

The sensitivity of the keyboard is good, even when I prefer softer keys as those of the HP Pavilion dv5 or Sony Vaio laptops. Although if we press strongly the keyboard we can see a certain degree of bending, there is no flex while typing, so you can type comfortably. The layout of the keyboard is very good, with all the special keys grouped in the upper right, and it is very easy to get used to it.

The multimedia keys are touch sensitive and allow to open the Dell Average Direct, control the playback of Dell Media Direct or Windows Media Player (play/pause, stop, forward, backward) but not of Winamp (I did not test other players), control the volume of the system (increase, decrease, mute) and eject the disk of the optical drive. Multimedia controls are not illuminated but they light up when touched; the sensitivity is very good and by now they have not been activated accidentally.

Dell Studio 15 - keyboard

Touchpad: sensitivity average, buttons very good, configuration good.

The touchpad has a slightly rough surface that poses little resistance, on which the finger glides easily. The cursor movement is smooth and precise. Some users complain that this model shows an erratic movement of the cursor, but during these 3 weeks of use I only have experienced it once or twice, and I have not experienced any pause of 0.5 s every 10 s as other users commented. The click of the buttons is soft and makes almost no noise, and they donot feel cheap . Tapping is not perfect, and sometimes it is necessary to repeat the tap . You can configure the standard functions, in addition to the horizontal and vertical scroll , zoom and “circle movement” (I have disabled everything except the scroll), but you cannot define “tap zones” as in the Synaptics touchpads.

 

Audio: volume mediocre, quality average, bass mediocre, configuration good.

Speakers are, for me,  the weakest point of the Dell Studio 15. Los altavoces son la queja principal que tengo de este portátil. I am not an audiophile, but i like music and I can notice the difference in quality between the Logitech X-210 that I have attached to my desktop computer and the Logitech Z-4 that I have in the living room. The Dell Studio 15 do not have a subwoofer, so a deep and powerful sound cannot be expected, but even when compared to other laptops without subwoofer the audio of this laptop is poor. Basses are there, not as in my LG LS70 in which it seemed that the bassist was on holiday, but even the quality of the high tones is only acceptable. The volume allows listening to music or a film even if there is some environmental noise, but it gets distorted easily if you try to set it very loud. Using the Windows Vista audio properties and the laptop own IDT Audio Control Panel (with graphic equalizer) you can improve sound output a little, but the speakers simply are unable to deliver a good sound. You can listen to some music in the background or follow a movie or game, but you cannot really enjoy them. Of course, the audio outputs can be used (it has two 3.5 mm headphone jacks) to plug the laptop to quality speakers or headphones.

Ports

I like the distribution of the connections: all of them are on the sides, so they are easily accessible and not bother especially. I have not missed any port, and 4 USB ports (one of them shared with an eSATA port) are more than enough.

Dell Studio 15 - left side

 Left side: In the hinge there is a button to search for WiFi connections. Following there is the slot for a security lock, the wireless switch, HDMI, VGA, 2 USB (the top shared with eSATA), Ethernet, microphone, two headphones, 54 mm Expresscard and card reader.

Dell Studio 15 - front

 Front: infrared port in the center.

 

Dell Studio 15 - right side

Right side: FireWire (IEEE 1394), 2 USB ports, slot-loading DVD burner, power plug and power button. I’m a bit afraid of slot-loading, but I have not experienced any problems until now.

Dell Studio 15 - rear

Rear: no ports. You can see the heat vent; it is a convenient location, so the hot air is thrown far from your hands, nearby peripherals or other objects you could be keeping at hand.

Comfort: temperature very good, noise good.

The laptop is quite cold and very silent when performing tasks low-intensity tasks: it is warm to the touch but you can have it on your lap without problems (at least in winter and with jeans), and the fan only turns on occasionally. If you are connected to the power outlet and doing more demanding tasks, such as playing a 3D game, the fan is turned on and can be heard constantly; although it is clearly audible, it helps keeping the laptop almost at the same temperature than when surfing the net, so that you can continue using it comfortably. I have to recognize that if you are very sensitive to noise you can find it annoying, but as I use to play with headphones I do not find the noise too problematic.

 

Dell Studio 15 - bottom

The bottom has three ventilation slots. The battery has a button that, when pressed, indicates the level of charge. For upgrades and repairs, all the bottom is open…

Dell Studio 15 - open bottom

…that gives easy access to the memory modules, hard disk and internal cards. As you see, there is an internal slots used by the WiFi  module and two free slots for WWAN, Turbo Memory or similar.

Webcam: pictures good, video good, audio good.

The webcam is 2.0 Mpx and allows to take pictures of up to 1600×1200. The image quality is good, but there is some static, especially if the lighting is not very good; it also lets you record video up to 640×480. The built-in microphones record at a quite low volume and initially capture a lot of hissing, but removing the Microphone Boost in the recording options improved the audio recording. All in all, for casual video recording or videoconferencing is quite good.

General performance

Considering that the configuration is quite basic and that it runs Windows Vista, I was surprised by the good performance. Working with 4-10 Firefox tabs, GIMP with 2-3 pictures of 5 Mpx and a few other apps (OpenOffice Writer, Microsoft Word or maybe Dreamweaver) you can switch tasks without delay, but sometimes it keeps thinking for a few seconds to open a window or a menu: quirks of Windows Vista, I guess.

I tested HD video playing using Quicktime: interestingly, while some H264 trailers such as 300 (720p) and The Bourne Ultimatum (1080p) play flawlessly, with a CPU usage of 30-60%, the Serenity trailer (720p) is laggy at times, with up to 90% of CPU usage; on my desktop computer (see specs below) it is completely smooth. More tests with additional trailers and computers are needed to find out if it is a isolated problem or if the configuration is too weak for HD video playback. Anyway, the Serenity trailer is mostly OK, but not perfect.

Update: It is clearly a software issue. Using VLC Media Player instead of Quicktime, the Serenity trailer plays perfectly, I watched 5 more H264 trailers (two of them 1080p) and all of them were perfectly fluid. All clips from dvdloc8.com.

I ran PCMark 05 and 3DMark 06 to be able to compare the scores of my Studio 15 to other laptops:

PCMark 05: 45483DMark 06:  1802

I also performed a comparision against my desktop computer in a series of real world task. All the tests were performed using free sofwtare, so anyone willing to compare scores can do it without spending a cent. The configuration of my desktop computer is: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 (3.0 GHz), 2 GB RAM DDR2-800, 750 GB HD (7200 rpm), ATI Radeon HD 3450 (256 MB), Windows XP Professional SP2. The tarks performed were the following:

  • WinRAR: compressing the Far Cry demo folder (567 MB) in RAR format.
  • Folder copy: creating a copy of theFar Cry demo folder (567 MB).
  • Video transcoding: converting The Bourne Ultimatum trailer (H264 at 1920×816) to Xvid at 320×240 using Any Video Converter.
  • Multitasking: the same conversion while the Far Cry demo folder is compresed in RAR and GIMP has open 14 pictures of 5 Mpx.
  • Far Cry (demo) Low, 800×600. Average fps.
  • Far Cry (demo) High (Medium texture filter quality), 1280×800. Average fps.
  • Crysis (demo) Low, 800×600. Average fps.
  • Crysis (demo) High, 1280×800. Average fps.

Results:

Dell Studio 15 - benchmarks

As expected the difference in processor frequency (3 GHz in the desktop vs 2 GHz in the Dell Studio 15) is clearly noticeable in most tasks, but the biggest difference is in the folder copy task, moltly influenced by hard drive speed. But in the multitasking test the Studio 15 scores better than the desktop: as the test implies a very high memory use, the 3 GB of RAM give a significant advantage to the laptop; in addition, it is likely that Windows Vista handles multicore processors better than XP.

Gaming performance

The Dell Studio 15 is clearly not a gaming laptop: a moderatly old game such as Far Cry (2004) is playable at 1280×800 and High detail, but gameplay is not as smooth as it is desirable (I got 19-21 fps, 26.7 fps average). A demanding game such as Cryisis is quite playable at minimal settings (800×600, everything set Low), even while the scores are not good (13-40 fps, 25.3 fps average); but in points where there is fog or similar effects (like when the plane door opens in the introduction, or when you are close to the flare after the first encounter) performance drops considerably, so scenes where this kind of effects are widely used could become unplayable.

I also published gaming benchmarks for the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450.

Battery life

Although I have not been able to make a more extensive testing, after surfing the Net for 2 hours and 11 minutes with maximum screen brightness and the balanced energy profile, still a 27 percent of the charge was left (44 minutes estimated); so you can expect a battery life of almost 3 h, something more lowering the screen brightness and choosing the energy saving profile.

Veredict

I am very happy with the Dell Studio 15. Of course, I would like better speakers, a more sensitive touchpad and softer keyboard, but this laptop fullfils my needs and, keeping in mind that it can be had from 499 € in the basic configuration, it is a real bargain.

Strengths

  • Good configuration for the price
  • Nice and modern design
  • Good screen compared to laptops in the same price point
  • Does not get hot, even while gaming
  • Good port and keyboard layout

Major weaknesses

  • None

Minor weaknesses

  • Mediocre speakers
  • Touchpad sensitivity not perfect
  • Can be noisy under heavy load
  • Screen not suitable for outdoors

Some purchase options

Do you want more information, or would like to add some? Use the forum.

HP coupon code (01/12/2009)

Monday, January 12th, 2009

30% off web-only coupon for the purchase of an HP Pavilion dv7t, tx2z, HDX 16t, or HDX 18t Notebook PC when you purchase one or more Notebook accessories on same order at the HP Home & Home Office Store!  Coupon code: NB8818. Offer limited to the first 1,000 coupons redeemed.  1 redemption per person or address.  Not valid with other promotions. Restrictions apply. Not combinable with instant rebates. For complete conditions, see “Coupon Information” in the “Customer Service” section at www.hpshopping.com.

Laptop reviews: Dell Studio XPS 16, Dell Studio 15 (optimitza), Sony Vaio P, HP Mini 2140, Panasonic Toughbook F8 and others

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

Here you have the laptop reviews of the week:

Other interesting reviews:

Do you want to be always up-to-date in laptop reviews? Subscribe to the news section of Towards the optimal laptop.