<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>towards the optimal laptop &#187; benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://optimitza.cat/news/tag/benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://optimitza.cat/news</link>
	<description>laptops and tech news at Towards the optimal laptop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Intel Core i7 upgrade for the Alienware M11x is well worth it (in some games)</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/07/16/the-intel-core-i7-upgrade-for-the-alienware-m11x-is-well-worth-it-in-some-games/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/07/16/the-intel-core-i7-upgrade-for-the-alienware-m11x-is-well-worth-it-in-some-games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alienware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultraportables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clerarly the older processors are OK for most games, but I was amazed by the performance improvement of the Core i7 640M processor over the older Pentium SU4100 (even overclocked at 1.7 GHz) in some games, namely Shattered Horizon and Battlefield: Bad Company 2. So if you can afford it and don&#8217;t mind losing some [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/02/02/alienware-m11x-launched-and-reviewed/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Alienware M11x launched and reviewed'>Alienware M11x launched and reviewed</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/09/21/intel-core-i7-for-laptops-benchmarked/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Intel Core i7 for laptops benchmarked (720QM, 820QM, 920XM)'>Intel Core i7 for laptops benchmarked (720QM, 820QM, 920XM)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/01/18/core-i7-processors-available-for-the-alienware-m17x/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Core i7 processors available for the Alienware M17x'>Core i7 processors available for the Alienware M17x</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/07/16/the-intel-core-i7-upgrade-for-the-alienware-m11x-is-well-worth-it-in-some-games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeForce GTX 480M benchmark compilation</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/07/08/geforce-gtx-480m-benchmark-compilation/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/07/08/geforce-gtx-480m-benchmark-compilation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia GeForce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main benchmarking sites have already published results of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M (mobile Fermi). In case you missed some of them, here you have a compilation: Notebookcheck (Core i7 920) Hot Hardware (Core i7 920) Notebookjournal.de (Core i7 920) Tom&#8217;s Hardware (Core i7 820QM) AnandTech (Core i7 820QM) Please note that only the [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-benchmarks-mobile-fermi-10-faster-than-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/07/07/laptop-vs-desktop-geforce-gtx-280m-vs-gtx-280-toms-hardware/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Laptop vs Desktop: GeForce GTX 280M vs GTX 280 (Tom&#8217;s Hardware)'>Laptop vs Desktop: GeForce GTX 280M vs GTX 280 (Tom&#8217;s Hardware)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/26/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-mobile-fermi-available-for-preorder-at-xotic-pc/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M (mobile Fermi) available for preorder at Xotic PC'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M (mobile Fermi) available for preorder at Xotic PC</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/07/08/geforce-gtx-480m-benchmark-compilation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-benchmarks-mobile-fermi-10-faster-than-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-benchmarks-mobile-fermi-10-faster-than-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fermi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia GeForce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As usual, the guys at Notebookcheck.net are among the first ones providing benchmarks of the lastest mobile graphics cards. They have published a review of the GTX 480M in the Clevo D901F that you can read in depth, but from their results, I have to say I&#8217;m not very impressed. In Battlefield: Bad Company 2 [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/26/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-mobile-fermi-available-for-preorder-at-xotic-pc/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M (mobile Fermi) available for preorder at Xotic PC'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M (mobile Fermi) available for preorder at Xotic PC</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/06/laptop-graphics-card-comparison-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870-5850-5730-5650-5470-and-nvidia-geforce-gtx-285m-gtx-260m-gts-360m-gt-330m-310m/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Laptop graphics card comparison: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870, 5850, 5730, 5650, 5470 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M, GTX 285M, GTX 260M, GTS 360M, GT 330M, 310M'>Laptop graphics card comparison: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870, 5850, 5730, 5650, 5470 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M, GTX 285M, GTX 260M, GTS 360M, GT 330M, 310M</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/07/08/geforce-gtx-480m-benchmark-compilation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: GeForce GTX 480M benchmark compilation'>GeForce GTX 480M benchmark compilation</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-benchmarks-mobile-fermi-10-faster-than-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD 2010 platform for notebooks: it&#8217;s OK, but too expensive for the performance</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/03/amd-2010-platform-for-notebooks-its-ok-but-fails-to-impress/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/03/amd-2010-platform-for-notebooks-its-ok-but-fails-to-impress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC Magazine publishes one of the first reviews of a laptop with AMD&#8217;s latest mobile platform, the HP Pavilion dv6-3013cl sporting an AMD Phenom II N930 quad-core processor and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 integrated graphics. CPU-based benchmark scores are OK, close to the ones of an Intel Core i5 processor, but sometimes closer to [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/20/short-news-new-amd-platform-for-laptops-more-ati-graphics-in-alienware-notebooks-and-macbook-updated/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Short news: new AMD platform for laptops, more ATI graphics in Alienware notebooks and Macbook updated'>Short news: new AMD platform for laptops, more ATI graphics in Alienware notebooks and Macbook updated</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/12/18/amd-phenom-ii-processors-for-laptops-quad-cores-with-a-25-w-tdp-now-im-listening/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: AMD Phenom II processors for laptops: quad-cores with a 25 W TDP. Now I&#8217;m listening!'>AMD Phenom II processors for laptops: quad-cores with a 25 W TDP. Now I&#8217;m listening!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/10/05/hp-launches-laptops-based-on-the-amd-tigris-platform-with-45-nm-processors-codenamed-caspian/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: HP launches laptops based on the AMD Tigris platform (with 45 nm processors, codenamed Caspian)'>HP launches laptops based on the AMD Tigris platform (with 45 nm processors, codenamed Caspian)</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/03/amd-2010-platform-for-notebooks-its-ok-but-fails-to-impress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptop graphics card comparison: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870, 5850, 5730, 5650, 5470 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M, GTX 285M, GTX 260M, GTS 360M, GT 330M, 310M</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/06/laptop-graphics-card-comparison-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870-5850-5730-5650-5470-and-nvidia-geforce-gtx-285m-gtx-260m-gts-360m-gt-330m-310m/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/06/laptop-graphics-card-comparison-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870-5850-5730-5650-5470-and-nvidia-geforce-gtx-285m-gtx-260m-gts-360m-gt-330m-310m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 09:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My last compilation of laptop graphics card benchmarks is too old, so here you have the new version. I&#8217;m only covering the last generation of graphics card, and only the most common ones: if the graphics card you are looking for is not here, go to Notebookcheck or use Google (look for the 3DMark Vantage Performance [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-benchmarks-mobile-fermi-10-faster-than-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/01/19/ati-mobility-radeon-hd-3670-gaming-benchmarks-vs-nvidia-geforce-9600m-gt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 gaming benchmarks vs Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT'>ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 gaming benchmarks vs Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/02/25/laptop-benchmarks-geforce-gtx-285m-sli-vs-mobility-radeon-hd-4870-crossfirex-clevo-vs-alienware/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Laptop benchmarks: GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 CrossFireX (Clevo vs Alienware)'>Laptop benchmarks: GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 CrossFireX (Clevo vs Alienware)</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/06/laptop-graphics-card-comparison-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870-5850-5730-5650-5470-and-nvidia-geforce-gtx-285m-gtx-260m-gts-360m-gt-330m-310m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptop benchmarks: GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 CrossFireX (Clevo vs Alienware)</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/02/25/laptop-benchmarks-geforce-gtx-285m-sli-vs-mobility-radeon-hd-4870-crossfirex-clevo-vs-alienware/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/02/25/laptop-benchmarks-geforce-gtx-285m-sli-vs-mobility-radeon-hd-4870-crossfirex-clevo-vs-alienware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility Radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia GeForce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The always excellent French site Portables4Gamers has benchmarked two mobile gaming beasts: a Cizmo Qi1840 (based on the barebone Clevo X8100) with the Nvidia GeForce GTX 285M SLI and an Alienware M17x with the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 CrossFireX. As expected, the result depends a lot on the game and the settings, so look [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/10/22/ati-mobility-radeon-hd-4870-in-the-alienware-m17x-is-gddr3-instead-of-gddr5/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in the Alienware M17x is GDDR3 instead of GDDR5'>ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in the Alienware M17x is GDDR3 instead of GDDR5</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/06/19/nvidia-geforce-gtx-280m-sli-benchmarks-notebookjournalde/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M SLI benchmarks (Notebookjournal.de)'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M SLI benchmarks (Notebookjournal.de)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/06/laptop-graphics-card-comparison-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870-5850-5730-5650-5470-and-nvidia-geforce-gtx-285m-gtx-260m-gts-360m-gt-330m-310m/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Laptop graphics card comparison: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870, 5850, 5730, 5650, 5470 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M, GTX 285M, GTX 260M, GTS 360M, GT 330M, 310M'>Laptop graphics card comparison: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870, 5850, 5730, 5650, 5470 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M, GTX 285M, GTX 260M, GTS 360M, GT 330M, 310M</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/02/25/laptop-benchmarks-geforce-gtx-285m-sli-vs-mobility-radeon-hd-4870-crossfirex-clevo-vs-alienware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/12/18/ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5650-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/12/18/ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5650-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility Radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was not aware that any laptop sporting an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5000 series was available, but I have found some benchmarks of the Mobility HD 5650 at Notebookjournal.de. It performs faster than the Mobility 4670, but not by a lot. So it seems a good successor for the Mobility 4650, but nothing revolutionary. [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-benchmarks-mobile-fermi-10-faster-than-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/05/24/ati-mobility-radeon-hd-4570-and-4530-crysis-benchmarks/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 and 4530 Crysis benchmarks'>ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 and 4530 Crysis benchmarks</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/01/19/ati-mobility-radeon-hd-3670-gaming-benchmarks-vs-nvidia-geforce-9600m-gt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 gaming benchmarks vs Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT'>ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 gaming benchmarks vs Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/12/18/ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5650-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia GeForce GT 230M, GT 240M and GTS 250M benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/11/24/nvidia-geforce-gt-230m-gt-240m-and-gts-250m-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/11/24/nvidia-geforce-gt-230m-gt-240m-and-gts-250m-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility Radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia GeForce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nvidia GeForce GT 230M and 240M are becoming quite popular in mainstream and multimedia laptops, while the GTS 250M is being introduced in high-end and gaming laptops. So I think it&#8217;s interesting to have a look at the available benchmarks (mainly from Notebookjournal.de and Notebookcheck). The GT 230M and 240M perform quite similarly, giving [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/05/06/laptop-graphics-card-comparison-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870-5850-5730-5650-5470-and-nvidia-geforce-gtx-285m-gtx-260m-gts-360m-gt-330m-310m/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Laptop graphics card comparison: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870, 5850, 5730, 5650, 5470 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M, GTX 285M, GTX 260M, GTS 360M, GT 330M, 310M'>Laptop graphics card comparison: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870, 5850, 5730, 5650, 5470 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M, GTX 285M, GTX 260M, GTS 360M, GT 330M, 310M</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-benchmarks-mobile-fermi-10-faster-than-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/01/19/ati-mobility-radeon-hd-3670-gaming-benchmarks-vs-nvidia-geforce-9600m-gt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 gaming benchmarks vs Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT'>ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 gaming benchmarks vs Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/11/24/nvidia-geforce-gt-230m-gt-240m-and-gts-250m-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Core i7 for laptops benchmarked (720QM, 820QM, 920XM)</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/09/21/intel-core-i7-for-laptops-benchmarked/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/09/21/intel-core-i7-for-laptops-benchmarked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the guys at PC Pro are first publishing benchmarks of the Mobile Core i7 processor for laptops. Performance-wise, the results are quite interesting: the mid-range Core i7-820QM (quad-core running at 1.73 GHz stock) is about as fast as the top of the line Core 2 Extreme QX9300, and it seems to cost arount 470 [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/10/26/intel-core-i7-mobile-processors-draw-a-30-more-power-than-core-2-ones/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Intel Core i7 Mobile processors draw a 30% more power than Core 2 ones'>Intel Core i7 Mobile processors draw a 30% more power than Core 2 ones</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/09/17/laptop-processor-benchmark-comparison-intel-core-2-x9100-x9000-t9600-t9500-p9500-t9400-t9300-p8600-p8400-t8300-t8100-p7350/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Laptop processor benchmark comparison (Intel Core 2 X9100, X9000, T9600, T9500, P9500, T9400, T9300, P8600, P8400, T8300, T8100, P7350, Atom N270)'>Laptop processor benchmark comparison (Intel Core 2 X9100, X9000, T9600, T9500, P9500, T9400, T9300, P8600, P8400, T8300, T8100, P7350, Atom N270)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/11/04/intel-core-i7-nehalem-performance/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Intel Core i7 (Nehalem) performance'>Intel Core i7 (Nehalem) performance</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/09/21/intel-core-i7-for-laptops-benchmarked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptop vs Desktop: GeForce GTX 280M vs GTX 280 (Tom&#8217;s Hardware)</title>
		<link>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/07/07/laptop-vs-desktop-geforce-gtx-280m-vs-gtx-280-toms-hardware/</link>
		<comments>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/07/07/laptop-vs-desktop-geforce-gtx-280m-vs-gtx-280-toms-hardware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia GeForce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://optimitza.cat/news/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was already known that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M was less powerful than the desktop version, because it used the older graphics core (very similar to that of the 9800M GTX+) and not the newer one found in the GTX 280. The guys at Tom&#8217;s Hardware have actually measured the difference. Long story short: [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/03/05/first-geforce-gtx-280m-benchmarks/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: First GeForce GTX 280M benchmarks'>First GeForce GTX 280M benchmarks</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2008/06/16/nvidia-geforce-gtx-280-and-260-the-next-generation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 and 260: the next generation'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 and 260: the next generation</a></li>
<li><a href='http://optimitza.cat/news/2010/06/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-benchmarks-mobile-fermi-10-faster-than-ati-mobility-radeon-hd-5870/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870'>Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M benchmarks (mobile Fermi): 10% faster than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://optimitza.cat/news/2009/07/07/laptop-vs-desktop-geforce-gtx-280m-vs-gtx-280-toms-hardware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

